(Liberty Bell) – It has been a wild three years of collusion, corruption, and wild conspiracy, but we can’t lose sight of everything that happened in the days leading up to the 2016 election, as this was the predecessor for what would become the most tightly orchestrated attempted coup in the history of our nation.
The Gateway Pundit is reporting that they received an email from a self-described “cyber expert” who explained that, as he claims, it would have been impossible for Crowdstrike to have identified Russia as the entity that hacked into the DNC servers before the 2016 election.
The claim is that the software does not exist to identify a hacker, so it’s impossible for Crowdstrike to have done this.
Here are parts from an email that was forwarded to the Gateway Pundit and as well as other top conservative websites:
As we work to prepare for the Durham showdown, we have for too long searched for a simplified explanation the people could understand on the Russian Hacking Hoax which is a story that has a shelf life and will be weaponized (again) for 2020.
The sender of this email suggests that former interim chair Donna Brazile may have been the only one to leak the DNC emails to the press. This is believable, considering it’s pretty well-established that she leaked the debate questions to Hillary Clinton, after all.
The key here, according to the emailer, is Crowdstrike:
Crowdstrike is nothing more than THERANOS (Google it.) on steroids. The company [Crowdstrike] claimed their antivirus software could not only find a hack, but could tell you WHO was responsible. This is false. Malware is just a series of text files. If you open the file and see Beatles Lyrics, that does not in any way make a case for attribution. It is that simple. Just like THERANOS, they don’t have a working product. Never did. I can show you the proof of that in a live demonstration.
Crowdstrike is guilty of fraud, investor fraud, stock fraud and a myriad of other charges that mirror the fact patterns in the THERANOS case. Remember, the day they went public, it was to the tune of $6.3 billion. The day they went public, stock started being dumped. Classic Silicon Valley pump and dump scenario.
It’s true that Crowdstrike did go public and that Google was the buyer, TGP Notes.
“We reported this in July and suggested this may be a reason the Executives at Google cried when Trump won the election,” they explain.
In July 2015, Google invested $100 million into Crowdstrike:
Google Capital, the two-year-old growth equity arm of search giant Google (GOOG), announced its first security investment on Monday morning.
The fund has pumped $100 million into cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike. It was joined by cloud computing company Rackspace (RAX), which is a customer, and the firm’s existing investors Accel and Warburg Pincus. The new infusion represents a Series C round for the Irvine, Calif.-based company, bringing its total funding raised to date to $156 million.
This was admitted on Crowdstrike’s website.
Around this time, it was reported in February of 2015 that the intelligence community was advising Congress and the White House on potential Russian hacking and blaming this scepter, as far back as 2012, on Ukranian aggression. This would be four months before Trump announced he was running.
This information was no doubt based on claims made by Crowdstrike. A year later, the only firm that investigated the DNC emails that were released by WikiLeaks was Crowdstrike.
We asked in July, 2019, how was Crowdstrike able to determine that in 2015 the Russians hacked Congress because they were upset about Ukraine and then a year later claim Russians hacked the DNC because they didn’t like Hillary Clinton?
We reported on May 11, 2019, that Roger Stone and his legal team were requesting the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State and tied to Google. Of course a non-redacted report could not be obtained and Stone was eventually not allowed to ask this question per the judge overseeing his case, the most infamous Obama judge, corrupt Amy Berman Jackson.
Stone’s position was that if the Mueller team and the FBI did not inspect the DNC server, then how can they know that the server was hacked. This logical argument makes sense. But Stone was not allowed to ask this question in his case.
Their emailer continued:
So How do we “Get Capone? Plain and simple: Like THERANOS, CROWDSTRIKE’S software does not work.
Plain and simple: Like THERANOS, CROWDSTRIKE’S software does not work. Crowdstrike spiked the YARA match file at their NOC to match any Malware found to spit out a false and pre-determined Russian threat actor (Fake) and led this country on the biggest and most costly fishing expedition in cyber history.
And the emailer concludes after noting that he is working on having Bill Binney’s review as well:
We are going to tear this DNC Hoax playground down to the ground.
Carter Page, the man who was spied on by the FBI while he was part of the Trump campaign, responded to the email, teasing more information he’s going to release soon.
With respect to your reference to Donna’s book, I cited it in my original DNC complaint (¶ 45, below)… and I’m planning some important follow-up with that next month:
The former Acting Chair of Defendant DNC has also alleged that a meeting occurred at FBI headquarters on August 11, 2016 involving a representative of Defendant Perkins Coie, the Defendant Michael Sussmann, and staff of Defendant DNC: “When Michael Sussmann arrived, he took out his security clearance badge,likely left over from his time at the Department of Justice.I was impressed…”
Donna Brazile, Hacks: The Inside Story of the Break-ins and Breakdowns That Put Donald Trump in the White House, New York: Hachette, 2017, p. 66.